Been reading the Nuremberg Trials records, my review based on the materials available
Whenever I have time, I do a lot of reading. And since I'm a very boring person who likes reading tomes with small print about historical information, I decided to take up a pretty gargantuan reading project recently, the collected documentation and arguments of the prosecution of the Nuremberg Trials: https://archive.org/details/nazi-conspiracy-and-aggression-1/Nazi%20Conspiracy%20and%20Aggression%201/ First off, I have to say this is a very, very weighty read. The first two volumes alone are over 1100+ pages long, filled with absurd amounts of cross-referencing, and are detailed to extremes that it is obvious they wanted the record to stand the test of time in its comprehension. As to the subject of my currently reading project (which is still ongoing), I just want to summarize a few highlights of my historical observations. VOLUME I - This is a broad overview of the prosecution case as a whole against the defunct-Third Reich and its surviving members. In it, they critically an