My thoughts on the Limits of Free Speech in regards to Social Justice
I'm writing this post because I want to make my personal opinions on the limits of free speech clear, especially as it regards the social justice movement. Free speech means, in my view, speech that is unfettered so far as it does not infringe on the rights of others, and by rights, I means LEGAL rights. Social Justice Warriors seem to believe free speech should be restricted if it hurts their feelings, and not only is their no law to defend that (and there still isn't, thankfully), that is a foolish restriction that could decrease the range of expression in such arbitrary ways that almost ANYTHING could be construed as "hurting someone's feelings", since all humans have different emotional cues, so that should NEVER be a precondition for limits on speech. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes defined the legal limits of free speech as that which endangers the rights and safety of others, an eminently reasonably guideline, as the rights he was referring to are outli